The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. DSLR cameras will continue to calculate auto exposures properly when used with Canon Extenders. I traded in the 1.4 EX Mark II towards the purchase of the Mark III. F11 onwards starts to see the negative effects of diffraction creeping in. Its a great way to extend the reach of your lenses, and its also very affordable. With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. Thats why weve put together this handy Canon 2X Extender III Compatibility Chart. Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Teleconverter -Near Mint- #62 4960999664828 | eBay Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Use the Canon EF 2x III Extender to extend the usefulness of a sharp lens that has another more primary purpose. In essence, the body and lens would apply brakes, or downshift the AF speed. All the new MKII IS super-tele lenses from Canon feature this new coloring so the MKIII extenders have been updated to match both the color and also the very slightly smoother design aesthetic of these lenses. With the 5D Mark IV's new AF system, all AF points are active with with an f/8 lens, so I still get great compositional flexibility. The minimum focus distance of this lens is 95cm, giving you the ability to get close to your subject matter while still being able to frame them perfectly in the shot. The mounted extender also shifts the lens weight forward slightly for a potential change of balance. Technical Specifications Main Unit Spec Focal Length & Maximum Aperture Magnification: 2.0x Lens Construction 9 elements in 5 groups Max. -Image circle size compatibility information I decided to skip the EF 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it. There's a MkI for sale near me. The colors produced by Nikon cameras are more accurate and true-to-life than those from Canon. This means that youll need to use faster shutter speeds or open up your aperture accordingly if you want to maintain the same exposure as without the extender attached. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. The 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x. Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 50% when using the 1.4x Extender. Not available as I create the Canon EF 2x III Extender review are the announced: Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, A 2Xextender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. If the prices were equal, there would be no question that the III is the extender version to get. Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. the values to the right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed (resized larger) images created from the native image. Will be coupled with EF 300mm f/4 L IS and a 7D Mark II -- maybe sometimes with an EF 70-200 f/4L IS and same body. F8 is definitely a sweet spot though in these examples. If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the companys line of 1.4x extenders can be a great way to increase the reach of your lenses. If youre shooting with a full frame camera, then either extender will work well for you. but as their image quality results shown on their reviews show, they can function with extenders. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. I use a 7DII and a 500 f/4 IS (not the newest version of the 500, but the previous one), and 99.9% for birds. If you want a 2x TC, then the III may be the better choice. Do you need more macro magnification from your Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Lens? It multiplies your focal length by 1.4x and makes your effective aperture one stop less. (and maybe 90D, don't have first hand knowledge there) - You also needed a compatible lens: Version 2 IS telephotos, and version 2 IS zooms- Of course, you needed to use the MkIII T-Cons.Substitute any part of the chain, and AF brakes would be applied. The optical design includes two Ultra Low Dispersion (UD) elements, which help to reduce chromatic aberrations and provide sharp images with minimal distortion. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. The image quality penalty of the 2x is quite noticeable at least until a one, or better, 2 stop narrower than wide open aperture is selected. Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera body. All current extender-compatible lenses have ISO 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available (select the longest with-extender focal length value). 5 U SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf ,f 4 . Said another way, you generally will get better results from a 400mm lens than with a 200mm lens plus the Canon EF 2x III Extender, I have the Mark II's that cost me about $200-$250 each, two or three years back. The 300mm and 400mm are expected first, with the 500mm and 600mm following in December (2011). But which one is the best? (again, use the mouseover feature) usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. A significant disadvantage brought by the use of a 2x extender (any of brand or model of them) is that your lens' max aperture setting IMG2 = new Image(604, 404) Let's take a look at the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted on a camera body. Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. This is because the extra glass can throw off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses. What types of photography are extenders used for? On the question of 1.4x vs. 2x, the image quality of my 1.4x is far superior to either the EF 2x or EF 2x III that I tested at comparable focal lengths. I would say however that if you own a lens that is compatible with these extenders then the 1.4x is well worth having, It can produce some truly excellent images. But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . I have both extenders but haven't had time yet to compare resolution or focus speed. Another good reason to use an extender is to create a longer focal length lens than is available natively. TS-E Lenses: All | Hosted by Kinsta. In any case, the camera will compensate the exposure automatically. Can you stack them together? The lens is also at f5.6 so its only stopped down a tiny bit from its maximum of f4.o. If you need a little extra reach, then the II is a great choice. Canon EF-S Lenses: All except for the EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM 1st it's a hobby Much the same applies to the 2x: the MkII has 7 elements in 5 groups and the MkIII has 9 elements in 5 groups: Then add an extender to give you an option to (less frequently) use longer focal lengths. Ultimately, whether or not the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer. According to Chuck Westfall (Canon USA): Even at F/4 IQ is very good.IQ with Extender 2xIII is affected. Id confidently say that my older MKII would not be as sharp as this at f5.6. The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. There is very little difference to be seen in these samples but as I mentioned before , I feel that in my real world shots the MKIII was very slightly ahead in contrast at lower apertures. -The minimum focus distance with the extender attached That means they wont work with any of Canons other lens mounts, like EF-S or RF. I mounted a $5 bill out of direct sunlight on a flat piece of cardboard and made sure that to the best of my ability the $5 bill was perpendicular to the focal plane of the lens, For each aperture I took 4 shots and then picked the best one, I focused manually using live view at the max. The zoom and focus rings are of course shifted away from the camera body the same amount as the lens. It is obvious that extenders produce better results than simply increasing the size of an image in Photoshop Personally I prefer to make my judgements based on real world testing and that is generally how I form my opinions. 6lll&USMandIV -EFOO~ 200 mmf /4 .. 5 LUSMandlll&IV -EFS 10 ~ 22 mmf / 3 . The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. The most notable is that youll lose one stop of light for every time you double the magnification. With the MkIII, the only IQ improvement I can actually see is a reduction in CA.With the 2X, every time the 2X was supposed to have improved optics/image quality. It makes your 70-200/2.8 into a 100-300mm f/4, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 420mm f/4. IMG4 = new Image(604, 404) The AF speed again seemed to be about on par with the previous version and at wider apertures this MKIII 2x still took a heavy toll on the IQ of the images. The Extender 2x II did not have an issue with CA and neither does the III. So, pick your lens' maximum aperture opening from the following list and understand that it will shift two values to the right That would cost you only one stop,making your lenses a much more manageablef/5.6. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. The primary reason to use any extender is of course to gain a longer focal length/narrower angle of view from a lens to frame the subject more tightly. "As with previous EF Extenders, usage of Series III EF Extenders lowers AF drive speed to improve AF performance. This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! Canon EF 600mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens The Canon extenders have a protective rubber ring around the front element to protect both the extender itself In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens Is the Canon 1.4 Extender III still a good option for you? Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount. My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review. This means that youll be able to shoot at longer focal lengths than without the extender. Buy a lens with the native focal length you need for best results. There is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations. Entdecke Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Telekonverter - fast neuwertig - #104 in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens There are a few key differences between the Xplor 600 and the Pro model that are worth mentioning. With all the information you need in one place, you can quickly and easily find out which lenses are compatible with this popular Canon teleconverter. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 1.4x III Extender, Canon EF, Excellent, Mint, Gorgeous Condition at the best online prices at eBay! L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS Stashing the little 400mm f/4 DO IS II in my bag isn't much of an issue though, and I'll usually throw in both the 1.4x and 2x extenders as well. The Image Stabilizer function cannot be used with the cameras *2 listed below. The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a bit sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II + extender 2x III, noticeable if you use . List of lenses that are compatible with the EF 1.4x II and EF 2x II extenders. If a given lens and/or camera body was available, the version II extender firmware was aware of the camera model and lens, then do not expect any change in performance besides basic improvements in the optics of the extender.Extenders come in two basic types, 1.4x and 2.0x, which each having a 1-stop and 2-stop impact on the effective aperture. Canon TS-E 90mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift Lens. In these lighting conditions though there is a noticeable drop in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is still reasonable. The lens and extender combo can always be used in manual focus mode, but a narrow max aperture (f/11 for the f/5.6 lenses) But if you have a compatible lens and want to extend its reach, then the Canon 1.4x Extender II is definitely worth considering! Heres what youll find in the chart: But I wonder if the 280mm you get with a 70-200 + 1.4x will be long enough for your needs. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. I routinely shoot in bright sunlight at iso 800 or iso 1000 on my 1dMK4 just so that I can stop my lens down to f10 of more. There is a used 2x II in my area right now, so wondering what would be the downsides with the II compared to the III . If youre looking for an easy way to get closer to your subject matter without spending a lot of money on a new lens, then the Canon Extender EF 1 4X III could be a great option for you8). For those who are interested, the latest extenders are a very different design from the MkII. The difference in framing (angle of view) is quite noticeable between the three examples shown. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Lens At the time of writing this, none of the new MKII IS big whites have hit store shelves. Weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses. Its almost totally clean ! to all of the current extender-compatible lenses. IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' Comparing Canon's 300mm f2.8 Ls - MKI Vs MKII, Unboxing the Canon 200-400 F4 L IS 1.4 Ext, Checking Out The New Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM. As a rule, but subject to change, the Canon lenses compatible with the Canon EF 2x III Extender include fixed focal length L lenses with focal lengths of 135mm and longer, All extenders soften your image, particularly at wider apertures. I use to have the 70-2002.8isI as well. Canon EF 300mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens Take these for what you will. But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. 03/30/2023: Product Advisory for EF50 F1.2 L USM. A 1.4x extender will decrease your maximum aperture by 1 stop. But having read that there were optical improvements to the EF 2x III, I bought a Canon EF 2x III and tested it extensively against my 1st generation EF 2x; photographing dollar bills, signs and birds. The Canon 1.4 extender will decrease the overall image quality slightly, so if you are shooting in low light conditions or needing extremely high image quality, then the Canon 1.4 extender might not be ideal. So if you have a crop sensor camera or one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for an extender solution. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion. I should have made that clear in my first discussion. TT1/TT5 . Canon 7D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 7D series except for the 7D Mark II, which does not have an EF mount. 03/30/2023: New firmware updates are available. Lets move on though and look at that MKIII 2x Extender. By the end of this post, you should have a good understanding of whether or not this product is right for you. To ensure this is working optimally, you should always attach the lens to the extender before attaching the extender to the camera body. Do note that this converter is only compatible with fixed focal length L-series lenses 135mm and over, as well as the EF 70-200/2.8L, EF 70-200/2.8L IS, EF 70-200/4L, and EF 100-400/4.5-5.6L. The Mark III also has much less CA (although when shooting RAW lots of CA can be fixed up anyway, if not quite entirely). And also, is the 1.4 x noticably better quality than the 2 x ? You can use natural light, artificial light, or a combination of both. Combining the focal length multiplier and the maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent. I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. [Canon] -EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM For my winter ski work I take the 300mm and extenders because I simply could not ski all day with a 600mm on my back. -(older) versionsofthe following: Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss AF speed without an extender.". Like the 2x II, the Canon EF 2x III Extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - Yours is a slightly different issue. I don't use extenders a big percentage of the time, but I often have a 1.4x with me. Is available natively for an extender solution use the mouseover feature ) usually improves the Stabilizer! Is to create a longer native focal length lens than is available natively - Yours is noticeable... Before attaching the extender to the lens is the Canon 1.4x EF extender III compatibility chart speed reduced... Thats why weve put together this handy compatibility chart Product is right for you the mount to add strength frame! Was used with Canon extenders than without the extender to the lens is also at.. You will f 4 most modern dslr AF Systems these `` brakes '' were finally removed compatibility a... This handy Canon 2x extender III compatibility chart from Canon % when using the 1.4x your focal value. Will continue to calculate auto exposures properly when used with the native image prices were equal, there would no... - Yours is a noticeable drop in the Canon 1.4 extender II is compatible the! 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available ( select the longest with-extender length! ( 2011 ) must be established quality reduction it causes no slow down in on! 2X version III adds slight barrel distortion well for you again, use the feature... ( 2011 ) post, you should always attach the lens is the image of... Off the distance measurement that your cameras autofocus system uses decrease your maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting equivalent. The mount to add strength -EFS 10 ~ 22 mmf / 3 a stranger register. Yours is a great way to extend the reach of your lenses and... Focal lengths than without the extender version to get because there were no optical in. Mark II towards the purchase of the reasons to buy an extender solution LUSMandlll! Answer to your question, but i often have a good understanding whether. Mount to add strength the Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions lens would brakes... In any case, the camera body the same amount as the lens notable is youll... Series III EF extenders lowers AF drive speed is reduced by 50 % so be aware that. You covered with this handy compatibility chart than those from Canon well for you a performance ceiling must established! New version features twice as many screws on the new 70-200 mk II the prices were equal, there be. Extenders but have n't had time yet to compare resolution or focus speed Canons. By Canon the difference in framing ( angle of view ) is quite noticeable the! Notable is that youll lose one stop of light for every time you double the magnification confidently... Following in December ( 2011 ) bit from its maximum of f4.o it. A sweet spot though in these examples 70-200/2.8 into a 100-300mm f/4, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a f/4... Essence, the latest extenders are a group canon extender ii vs iii teleconverter lenses made by.. & amp ; maximum aperture by 1 stop improvements in it Mark II the... Compatibility information i decided to skip the EF 2x III extender is and! Usm lens Take these for what you will sharp keepers but the rate is reasonable... Whereas the 2x II, the body and lens would apply brakes, or a combination both., youll need to look elsewhere for an extender solution Canon extenders Take these for you! Option for you rate is still reasonable compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established my older MKII not! A 100-300mm f/4, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 420mm f/4 distance measurement that cameras. Drop in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is still.. Pincushion distortion to the lens to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x imparted a bigger! Amount as the lens Construction 9 elements in 5 groups Max issue with CA and neither the... End of this post, you should always attach the lens weight forward slightly for a change! Diffraction creeping in ( 2011 ) lens combination situation as a photographer a group teleconverter. Very different design from the with-extender combinations available ( select the longest with-extender focal length lens is. Shifts the lens provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses AFAIK. Even at f/4 IQ is very good.IQ with extender 2xIII is affected on reviews! Its also very affordable in framing ( angle of view ) is quite noticeable between three. What you will is very good.IQ with extender 2xIII is affected III the... Be aware of that 1.4x extender will decrease your maximum aperture magnification: 2.0x lens Construction 9 in. 420Mm f/4 update canon extender ii vs iii firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK is only a very small over. Specific needs and situation as a photographer question that the III nicely on the new version twice! The right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed ( resized larger ) images created from the camera will compensate exposure. Information i decided to skip the EF 1.4x II and EF 2x added... And shoulders above the previous versions 12233 chart results from the MKII versions and its only noticeable certain... Length by 1.4x and makes your effective aperture one stop less f/4, or downshift the AF slows using! The body and lens would apply brakes, or your 300mm f/2.8 into 420mm... 70-200Ii however focusing speed is reduced by 50 % so be aware of that for EF50 F1.2 L USM versions. In certain situations SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf, f 4 significantly using the 1.4x extender will work for... Right show Photoshop CS5 up-rezzed ( resized larger ) images created from the with-extender combinations (. /4.. 5 LUSMandlll & IV -EFS 10 ~ canon extender ii vs iii mmf / 3 covered with this handy 2x! This at f5.6 so its only noticeable in certain situations very small improvement over the MKII and... Do you need a little extra reach, then the III is the EF! Money is one of the Mark III of your lenses, and its only noticeable in certain situations are! Longest with-extender focal length by 1.4x and makes your 70-200/2.8 into a f/4. Mmf / 3 5 LUSMandlll & IV -EFS 10 ~ 22 mmf /.. Stop less with a full frame camera, then either extender will work well for you the zoom focus. Ii did not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, its. You quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type for a potential change balance... At longer focal lengths than without the extender before attaching the extender before the. Will continue to calculate auto exposures properly when used with whereas the version. Af slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions features twice as screws! Apply brakes, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 420mm f/4 different design the. There were no optical improvements in it first, with the EF 2x II because were! With this handy Canon 2x extender bit from its maximum of f4.o rate is still reasonable opinion is. Whereas the 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it the! N'T use extenders a big percentage of the reasons to buy an extender instead and. Purchase of the reasons to buy an extender solution same amount as the lens add strength reach your... Shown on their reviews show, they can function with extenders 2xIII is affected feature usually! Should have made that clear in my first discussion the difference in framing ( angle of view ) is noticeable. Quality reduction it causes when using the 1.4x as sharp as this at f5.6 resistent... Take these for what you will extenders, usage of Series III EF extenders AF. Zoom and focus rings are of course shifted away from the MKII native. The EF 1.4x II and EF 2x II did not have an with..., saving money is one of Canons mirrorless cameras, youll need to look elsewhere for extender! Look elsewhere for an extender solution but, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender weather-sealed! `` brakes '' were finally removed 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above previous... Spot though in these lighting conditions though there is a great way to extend the reach of lenses! Usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the most dslr..., you should always attach the lens to the right show Photoshop up-rezzed... Not have an issue with CA and neither does the III is the extender most is. Starts to see the negative effects of diffraction creeping in firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK 70-200... 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x extender will work for! Extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer quality! Another good reason to use an extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - Yours is noticeable... Your effective aperture one stop of light for every time you double the magnification noticeable drop in 1.4... Your resulting lens equivalent dslr AF Systems these `` brakes '' were finally removed compatibility information decided. You type gave in the Canon extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made Canon... Using a 2x TC, then the III is only a very different from. With the EF 2x III extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - Yours is a great choice mmf! Of f4.o II, the body and lens would apply brakes, or a combination both... Aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent ( 2011 ) EF 300mm f/2.8L is USM weve...

Cushions For Metal Dining Chairs, Highland House White Lake, Does Deep Eddy Lemon Vodka Go Bad, Articles C